Purplepatch does marketing for IT services, staffing and cloud firms — positioning, content and demand generation for companies that sell capability rather than software, and have no product to demonstrate.
The Constraint
A software vendor can show the thing. An IT services firm cannot. What is being bought is a claim about how well work will be done by people the buyer has not met yet, on a project that has not started.
Which is why every competitor’s homepage reads the same. Certified engineers, proven methodology, trusted partner — the words are interchangeable because nobody has anything concrete to put in their place. Differentiation here lives or dies on specificity, and specificity is the one thing generic services copy never has.
The result is that technically stronger firms lose to weaker ones that explain themselves better. The gap is not in delivery. It is in everything the buyer reads before delivery starts.
What We Do
Case studies built around the constraint and the decision, not the technology stack.
Content for the buyer who has never bought this before and does not know what to ask.
Answer engine optimization, so you appear when a buyer researches a provider before ever contacting one.
Demand generation for a purchase with a long, quiet evaluation and no trial.
How We Work
Thirty questions your buyers actually ask, run across five answer engines, logged one by one — cited, mentioned or absent, and who is cited instead. The diagnosis changes what we do first, which is why we run it before we quote.
Then we publish weekly against named questions, clear a fifteen-check standard before anything goes live, and measure monthly. Every claim carries a source. Domain facts are reviewed by a named practitioner and credited on the page.
Proof
Six verticals, a fixed weekly cadence, and a thirty-prompt citation panel measured every month with the reading agreed in advance. Our own original research is published rather than held back.
Because evaluation happens before delivery does. A buyer choosing between two firms they cannot yet assess picks the one that explained the problem more convincingly. That is a marketing outcome, not a delivery one.
By being specific where they are general. A named environment, a named constraint, a number. Generic claims are interchangeable by definition, which is why they do not move anyone.
The thing that was actually hard, what it cost in time, and what happened afterwards. If a chief financial officer is in the buying group — and there usually is one — the case study has to answer their question as well as the technical one.
The structure is the same and the proof is different. Staffing sells access to people, so the evidence is about how those people are found, retained and matched — not about a methodology diagram.
Citations, not rankings. Thirty fixed questions, five engines, monthly, informational and commercial reported separately.
Ten seconds on your homepage. Can a first-time reader say what you do and who for? We will tell you what we found.
We use cookies to improve your experience. By continuing to visit this site you agree to our use of cookies.
Chat with our AI to analyze your website's content, SEO, accessibility, and more. Get actionable recommendations in seconds.
Get started with: